|
P1088 A trial court did not abuse discretion in striking portions of plaintiffs' separate statement of undisputed facts for procedural defects after plaintiffs were given an opportunity to correct the defects and failed to do so, or in granting summary judgment after the stricken portions left no questions of material fact to be decided that could result in judgment for plaintiffs; multiple plaintiffs opposing a single motion for summary judgment are bound by page restrictions on opposition papers as though they were a single party.CitationCOLLINS v HERTZ CORP (Procedural Defects) 144 CA4 64 [See: CCP 437c; CA R of C 342; Parkview Villas v State Farm 133 CA4 1197, P/AT 1/06]
|
|
