Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1056 Testimony given at a judgment debtor's examination after the entry of judgment in a prior case was not accepted or acted upon by the court that entered that judgment, so it should not judicially estop plaintiff from making a contrary claim in a subsequent, unrelated, proceeding.CitationJOGANI v JOGANI (Judicial Estoppel) 141 CA4 158 [See: Daar & Newman v VRL 129 CA4 482, P/AT 7/05; International v Feddersen 64 CA4 345, T/AT 7/98; Zedner v US 126 SCt 1976] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||