|
P1087 In a medical malpractice action based on the claim that defendants implanted too much radioactive material in treating plaintiff's prostate cancer, a declaration by defendants' expert stating that the treatment plan and the implantation were within the standard of care was too conclusory to satisfy defendants' burden on summary judgment, so plaintiff was not required to rebut it, and the motion should have been denied.CitationJOHNSON v SUPERIOR COURT (Excessive Radiation) 143 CA4 297 [See: Kelley v Trunk 66 CA4 519, T/AT 10/98; Bushling v Fremont 117 CA4 493, P/AT 5/04]
|
|
