|
4335 REVIEW DENIED In an action for attorney malpractice based on alleged negligence in filing an action past the period of limitations, the trial court’s previous ruling that the underlying action was time-barred does not preclude the defendant from arguing that it was not, since that ruling will be considered in the case-within-a-case approach to causation in the malpractice trial.CitationCHURCH v JAMISON (Case-within-a-case) 143 CA4 1568 [See: LabC 227.3; Salisbury v County 131 CA4 756, T/AT 9/05; Lombardo v Huysentruyt 91 CA4 656, T/AT 9/01]
|
|
