Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4298 REVIEW DENIED As a matter of law, the proper use of a police dog that was trained properly does not constitute deadly force and violates Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure only if the force used is judged unreasonable under an objective standard.CitationTHOMPSON v COUNTY OF LA (Police Dog) 142 CA4 154[See: 42 USC 1983; CivC 52.1; Graham v Connor 490 US 386; Quintanilla v City of Downey 84 F3 353; Smith v City of Hemet 394 F3 689] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||