|
4245 REVIEW DENIED An action under the Unfair Competition Law based on alleged violations of law was found to have been brought with probable cause, because there was reason to believe those laws would be violated by the conduct the action was designed to prevent; the fact that the action was untenable against other defendants because they were immune from liability did not prevent it from being untenable against the defendant who subsequently sued for malicious prosecution.CitationPAULUS v BOB LYNCH FORD (Dealership Duel) 139 CA4 659 [See: CCP 425.16; B&PC 17200 etseq; Jarrow v LaMarche 31 C4 728, P/AT 9/03; Sheldon Appel v Albert 47 C3 863; Wilson v Parker 28 C4 811, T/AT 9/02]
|
|
