Subscribe for CLE Announcements

PPE Logo
For Live and Recorded CLE Seminars, click:

CA Torts, PI, Employment
2022 March

Stream full CD all at once - no case/track breaks
Download full CD as one MP3 - no case/track breaks

Stream or download individual case summaries with the links below:
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.1
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.2
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.3
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.4
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.5
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.6
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.7
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.8
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.9
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.10
[Stream] [Download] Pincus-Finz.Torts.Mar2022.11
   To Download an MP3:
   
   Right-click (or click-hold) the [Download] link, and then:
   
   Chrome:  Save Link As
   FireFox: Save Link As
   Safari:  Save Link As
   Internet Explorer: Save Target As
   Opera:   Save Linked Target As
   
   'Internet'/Android: Save Link
   Chrome/Android:     Save Link
   Firefox/Android:    Not supported

   Browser Streaming Support

   Windows:
   Chrome:               Yes
   Firefox:              Yes
   Internet Explorer 10: Yes
   Internet Explorer 9:  Yes
   Internet Explorer 8:  Not supported, please upgrade
   Internet Explorer 7:  Not supported, please upgrade
   Safari:               Not supported
   Opera:                Not supported
   
   Mac:
   Safari:               Yes
   Chrome:               Yes
   Firefox:              Yes
   Internet Explorer 5:  Not Supported
   
   Android:
   (Tested on Galaxy S3)
   
   Chrome:  Yes
   Firefox:  Not supported
   'Internet' Browser: Not supported
   
   iPhone:

   Chrome:  Yes 

   
March 2022 Case List

01 Introduction

02 Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Mortgagee Duty) 12 Cal.5th 905 [Disapproving Weimer v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 47 Cal.App.5th 341; Rossetta v. CitiMortgage, Inc., 18 Cal.App.5th 628; Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 246 Cal.App.4th 1150; Alvarez v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 228 Cal.App.4th 941]

03 Cleveland v. Taft Union High School District (School Shooting) 76 Cal.App.5th 776 [See Gov't. Code 855.6, 820 and 815.2; C.A v. William S. Hart Union High School Dist. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 861]

04 Doe v. Brightstar Residential Incorporation (Duty and Foreseeability) 76 Cal.App.5th 171 [See Evid Code 1280; Rupf v. Yan (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 411]

05 Rogers v. Roseville SH, LLC (Invalid Arbitration Agreement) 75 Cal.App.5th 1065 [See Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 638; Flores v. Evergreen at San Diego, LLC (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 581]

06 Segal v. ASICS America Corp. (Taxing Costs) 12 Cal.5th 651 [See Seever v. Copley Press, Inc. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1550 (disapproved); Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 761; Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 836; Applegate v. St. Francis Lutheran Church (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 361]

07 Colonial Van & Storage v. Superior Court (Home Shooting) 76 Cal.App.5th 487 [See Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108; Southland Corp. v. Superior Court (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 656; Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149]

08 Khoiny v. Dignity Health (Academic Deference) 76 Cal.App.5th 390 [See Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Research v. United States (2011) 562 U.S. 44; Yanowitz v. L'Oreal, Inc. (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1028; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792; Boston Med. Center Corp. (1999) 330 NLRB 152; Doe v. Mercy Catholic Med. Center (3rd Cir. 2017) 850 F.3d 545]

09 Perez v. City and County of San Francisco (Scope of Employment) 75 Cal.App.5th 826 [See Farmers Ins. Group v. County of Santa Clara (1995) 11 Cal.4th 992; Henriksen v. City of Rialto (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1612]

10 Subsequent History [The three cases: Moriana v. Viking River Cruises, Inc., 2020 WL 5584508, cert granted 142 S.Ct. 734 (2021); Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, 913 F.3d 923 (2019); Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 19 F.4th 1188 (2021)]

11 Conclusion