Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4218 The presence of a visible, partially-unpadded snow-making hydrant on a ski trail in a location that permitted skiers to avoid collision with it did not increase the inherent risks of skiing, so primary assumption of the risk prevented the imposition of liability on a ski resort for injuries resulting from a collision with it.CitationSOUZA v SQUAW VALLEY (Unpadded Hydrant) 138 CA4 262 [See: Connelly v Mammoth 39 CA4 8, T/AT 11/95; Van Dyke v SKI 67 CA4 1310, T/AT 12/98] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||