4248 REVIEW GRANTED Termination of an employee who, because of a disability, was unable to perform her job functions until long after her position had been filled did not violate the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA); refusing to give the employee a position for which she was not qualified did not violate FEHA; holding the employee's position open for a reasonable period of time was a sufficiently reasonable accommodation to satisfy the requirements of FEHA; the Unruh Civil Rights Act does not create a disability discrimination cause of action on behalf of an employee.CitationWILLIAMS v GENENTECH (Reasonable Accommodation) 139 CA4 357 [See: GovC 12940 etseq; CivC 51; Hanson v Lucky 74 CA4 215, T/AT 10/99]
|
|