Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1067 It was error to disqualify a law firm representing two insurers being sued by another insurer by and through the Insurance Commissioner as liquidator because the firm had previously represented that insurer in an unrelated malpractice action against another lawyer.CitationFREMONT INDEMNITY v FREMONT GENERAL (Attorney Disqualification) 143 CA4 50 [See: Rules of PC 3-310; Flatt v Superior Court 9 C4 275, T/AT 2/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||