Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4195 Under a policy endorsement for which the insured paid extra and which expressly deleted an exclusion for damage resulting from the seizure of the insured airplane, the insurer was required to pay attorney fees incurred by the insured in resisting seizure and forfeiture of the airplane.CitationAMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INS v SUPERIOR COURT (Forfeited Aircraft) 135 CA4 1239 [See: Palmer v Truck Ins 21 C4 1109, T/AT 1/00; Bank of the West v SUPER.CT 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||