|
4357 REVIEW DENIED The Superior Court should not entertain a tort action based upon defendant's alleged disobedience to an order of the Family Court; a party whose demand was refused for certain documents in a family law proceeding may not obtain them by civil action brought in another department of the Superior Court; sanctions were properly imposed by a Family Court judge on a party who attempted to bring a frivolous civil action in Superior Court based upon conduct connected with orders of the Family Court.CitationBURKLE v BURKLE (Family Court) 144 CA4 387 [See: FamC 271; CCP 128.7; Neal v Superior Court 90 CA4 22, T/AT 7/01; Askew v Askew 22 CA4 942, T/AT 3/94; Bidna v Rosen 19 CA4 27, T/AT 12/93; Schnabel v Superior Court 5 C4 704]
|
|
