Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4325 A trial court was correct in applying standing provisions of Proposition 64 to an Unfair Competition Law action already pending when it went into effect, but should have granted leave to amend to substitute a plaintiff who did have standing.CitationFOUNDATION v NEXTEL (UCL Standing) 143 CA4 131 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; Californians v Mervyn's 39 C4 223, P/AT 9/06; Branick v Downey 39 C4 235, P/AT 9/06] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||