|
4179 REVIEW DENIED In the absence of evidence that a motorist who deliberately ran plaintiff's car off the road during a road-rage incident was motivated by an intent to serve his employer's interests, or that his conduct was inherent in his employment or incidental to the employer's enterprise, it cannot be found as a matter of law that he was acting within the scope of employment.CitationKEPHART v GENUITY (Road Rage) 136 CA4 280 [See: A&P v Dowling 159 SE 609; Lisa M v Mayo 12 C4 291, T/AT 1/96; Farmers v County 11 C4 992, T/AT 1/96]
|
|
