|
P1081 In deciding a motion for class certification in an action for violation of a City of Los Angeles ordinance setting a minimum wage for employees of firms who work on service contracts benefitting the City and brought on behalf of all employees who worked on such contracts, a challenge to the validity of a section of the ordinance purporting to make it apply only to employees who worked 20 hours in a month should have been resolved by certifying two subclasses -- one for employees who met the challenged requirement and one for employees who did not.CitationAGUIAR v CINTAS (Subclasses) 144 CA4 121 [See: Sav-On v Superior Court 34 C4 319, P/AT 11/04]
|
|
