|
4137 REVIEW DENIED In complying with plaintiff's request to procure a policy to insure a company with which plaintiff was doing business for the stated purpose of protecting plaintiff in the event the insured company failed to perform as promised, an insurance surplus-lines broker owed plaintiff a duty to procure a policy that would provide the requested protection, even though the broker had no relationship directly with plaintiff.CitationBUSINESS TO BUSINESS v ZURICH SPECIALTIES (Indian Software) 135 CA4 165 [See: Biakanja v Irving 49 C2 647; Bily v Arthur Young 3 C4 370, T/AT 11/92]
|
|
