|
P0970 A trial court did not abuse discretion in permitting a hearing on a SLAPP motion to be held 3 days past the 30 day statutory deadline, based on a declaration by the attorney for the moving party that when he attempted to schedule the hearing, the court clerk advised him that docket conditions made the date for which it was noticed the first available date, and on the opposing party's failure to offer any evidence to the contrary.CitationBARAK v QUISENBERRY (SLAPP Joinder) 135 CA4 654 [See: CCP 425.16; Decker v UD Registry 105 CA4 1382, P/AT 3/03]
|
|
