|
4147 REVIEW DENIED When a claim is made that a seller violated the Unfair Practices Act that prohibits giving secret benefits to certain purchasers without extending them to all who purchase on like terms and conditions, a plaintiff to whom the alleged benefits were not available is not required to show that it did business on the same terms and conditions.CitationEDDINS v REDSTONE (Video Rental) 134 CA4 290 [35 863 See: B&PC 17045, 17200 etseq; ABC v Matsushita 14 C4 1247, see T/AT 10/95; Diesel v Marco 16 CA4 202]
|
|
