4177 An automobile manufacturer that, for the purpose of increasing profits and without informing consumers, used tubular steel in the exhaust manifolds of its product rather than cast iron did not thereby violate the Unfair Competition Law or the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.CitationBARDIN v DAIMLERCHRYSLER (Exhaust Manifold) 136 CA4 1255 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; CivC 1750 etseq; Smith v State Farm 93 CA4 700, T/AT 12/01; Pastoria v Nationwide 112 CA4 1490, T/AT 12/03; Scripps v SUPER.CT 108 CA4 917, T/AT 6/03; Gregory v Albertson's 104 CA4 845, T/AT 1/03]
|
|