|
4242 REVIEW DENIED A plaintiff's evidence of possible reasons for installing a median barrier at a particular highway location did not establish that the design was unreasonable without a barrier; increased traffic and a corresponding increase in accidents do not by themselves establish a change in conditions resulting in a public entity's loss of design immunity; if the design of an improvement to public property is reasonable, liability cannot be imposed for failing to warn that it is dangerous.CitationWEINSTEIN v DEP'T OF TRANSPORTATION (Design Immunity) 139 CA4 52 [See: GovC 835, 830.6; Cornette v DOT 26 C4 63, T/AT 8/01]
|
|
