|
2156 REVIEW DENIED A trial court's statement on the record that it would continue granting motions for a new trial until a jury agreed with its conclusion concerning the reasonableness of defendant's conduct turned the court's order into one akin to a non-suit or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in reviewing it, the appellate court should draw all inferences in favor of the party who prevailed at trial.CitationCUNNINGHAM v SUPERIOR COURT (Overreaching Association) 67 CA4 743 [See: Nally v Grace 47 C3 278; Hansen v Sunnyside 55 CA4 1497, T/AT 8/97; Auto Equity v Superior Court 57 C2 450; Jones v Evans 4 CA3 115]
|
|
