Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1800 By informing the buyer of a condominium that the complex in which it was located had water infiltration problems and that a related lawsuit was pending against the builder, the seller sufficiently placed the buyer on notice of the possibility of water infiltration into the unit being purchased and did not commit fraudulent concealment.CitationPAGANO v KROHN (Wet Condo) 60 CA4 1 [See: CivC 2079; Salahutdin v Valley 24 CA4 555, T/AT 6/94; Sweat v Hollister 37 CA4 603, T/AT 9/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||