|
1985 A member of a high school cheerleading team is barred by the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk from recovering for injuries she sustained when another cheerleader fell on her while practicing; although an athletic instructor has a duty not to increase inherent risks of the activity, s/he has no duty to decrease those risks.CitationAARIS v LAS VIRGENES USD (Cheerleader A/R) 64 CA4 112 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Galardi v Seahorse 16 CA4 817, T/AT 8/93; Tan v Goddard 13 CA4 1528, T/AT 5/93; Wattenbarger v Cincinnati Reds 28 CA4 746, T/AT 11/94; Hohe v SD USD 224 CA3 1559]
|
|
