|
1811 A liability carrier had no obligation to defend actions against the insured based on sexual molestation or acts so intertwined with molestation as to be part of it, but it did have an obligation to defend actions based on conduct that could be found to be negligent and non-sexual.CitationSTATE FARM v CENTURY (Molesting Teacher) 59 CA4 648 [See: Gray v Zurich 65 C2 263; JC Penney v MK 52 C3 1009; InsC 533; Horace Mann v Barbara B 4 C4 1076, T/AT 593; Jane D v Ordinary Mut 32 CA4 643, T/AT 3/95]
|
|
