Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2139 A jury is not required to accept or reject in toto the uncontradicted testimony of an expert regarding plaintiff's economic damages.CitationABBOTT v TAZ (Rejected Expert) 67 CA4 853 [See: Da Silva v Pacific 195 CA3 1; Burke v City 111 CA2 314; Randles v Lowry 4 CA3 68] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||