|
2087 In the absence of any reason to believe that a corporate shareholder was individually involved in a transaction and in the absence of any ground for piercing the corporate veil, a claim against the shareholder for negligence by the corporation was not objectively tenable and, therefore, was brought without probable cause.CitationPURYEAR v GOLDEN BEAR (Probable Cause) 66 CA4 1188 [See: Bertero v National 13 C3 43; Sheldon Appel v Albert & Oliker 47 C3 863; Hufstedler v Superior Court 42 CA4 55, T/AT 3/96; Bixler v Goulding 45 CA4 1179, T/AT 7/96]
|
|
