|
1999 (SEE CASE #1828) A seller of realty who knows that the purchaser is buying it for resale and will repeat the initial seller's representations to remote purchasers has sufficient intent to induce the reliance of such remote purchasers when making misrepresentations to the intermediate purchaser / reseller.CitationSHAPIRO v SUTHERLAND (Noisy Neighbors) 60 CA4 666 [See: CivC 1102.6, 1102.5; Goodman v Kennedy 18 C3 335; Sweat v Hollister 37 CA4 603, T/AT 9/95; Geernaert v Mitchell 31 CA4 601, T/AT 2/95; Pagano v Krohn 60 CA4 1, T/AT 1/98]
|
|
