Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1949 The possibility that their security will be impaired does not make secured lenders indispensable parties to an action against a builder and developer for construction defects, and failure to join the lenders does not justify sustaining a demurrer.CitationHARBORING VILLAS v SUPERIOR COURT (Secured Lenders) 63 CA4 426 [See: CCP 389; Union v Superior Court 36 C3 15; Stratford v Empire 44 CA2 61] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||