|
2155 If issues of fact exist as to whether plaintiff's prior inconsistent position was the result of ignorance, fraud, or mistake, a motion for judgment on the pleadings should not be granted on the ground of judicial estoppel.CitationCLOUD v NORTHROP GRUMMAN (Bankruptcy Estoppel) 67 CA4 995 [See: Jackson v County LA 60 CA4 171, T/AT 1/98; Prilliman v United 53 CA4 935, ST 5/97; Herzog v Fredrics 61 CA4 672, T/AT 3/98; Drain v Betz 63 CA4 1125, T/AT 6/98; Bell v Wells Fargo 62 CA4 1382, T/AT 5/98; International v Feddersen 64 CA4 345, T/AT 7/98]
|
|
