Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1957 REVIEW DENIED A seismic retrofitter who performs work on a building for an owner who does not contemplate selling the building owes no duty to a remote purchaser of the building.CitationKERU v CUBE (Defective Retrofit) 63 CA4 1412 [See: Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108; Biakanja v Irving 49 C2 647; Connor v Great Western 69 C2 850; Huang v Garner 157 CA3 404; Sumitomo v Taurus 185 CA3 211] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||