Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2135 REVIEW DENIED A negligence action based on the claim that a ski resort increased the inherent risks of skiing by its placement and design of a directional sign was not barred by primary assumption of the risk.CitationVAN DYKE v SKI LTD (Ski Trail Sign) 67 CA4 1310 [See: CCP 437c(f)(1); Connelly v Mammoth 39 CA4 8, T/AT 11/95; Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; O'Donoghue v Bear Mountain 30 CA4 188, T/AT 12/94; Danieley v Goldmine 218 CA3 111] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||