|
2006 REVIEW DENIED In an action for fraud based on misrepresentations made in California and Oregon regarding a heart valve, which action was brought in a California court, and in which the only defendant is a California resident, Oregon has no interest in having its statute of limitations applied, and so the California statute is applicable.CitationDAVIS v SHILEY (Heart Valve) 64 CA4 1257 [See: Hurtado v Superior Court 11 C3 574; North American Asbestos v Superior Court 180 CA3 902; Ashland v Provence 129 CA3 790]
|
|
