Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2148 An unlicensed person hired to trim a back yard tree, that was subject to licensing requirements, is presumed to have done so as an employee of the homeowner; however, OSHA does not apply to household or domestic services and so the tree trimmer cannot derive the benefit of its provisions.CitationROSAS v DISHONG (Tree Trimmer) 67 CA4 815 [See: LabC 2750.5, 6300 etseq; B&PC 7026.1; SCIF v. WCAB 40 C3 5; Foss v Anthony 139 CA3 794; Zellers v Playa Pacifica 61 CA4 129, T/AT 3/98] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||