Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1910 REVIEW DENIED An inverse condemnation claim based on an amendment to land use regulations is not ripe until plaintiff has submitted at least one meaningful application for a development project which has been thoroughly rejected, and has prosecuted at least one meaningful application for a zoning variance, which has been finally denied.CitationMILAGRA RIDGE v CITY OF PACIFICA (Zoning Amendment) 62 CA4 108 [See: Lucas v SC Coastal 505 US 1003; MacDonald v County 477 US 340] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||