|
1850 The fact that attorneys hired an expert who was a member of a consulting firm that had once consulted with but was not retained by the attorneys' adversary, which expert was not employed by the consulting firm at the time of the consultation and had no knowledge of any confidential information the firm might have received, was not sufficient ground for disqualification of the attorneys or the expert.CitationWESTERN DIGITAL v SUPERIOR COURT (Same Expert) 60 CA4 1471 [See: Shadow Traffic v Superior Court 24 CA4 1067, T/AT 6/94]CASE
|
|
