|
2033 Without statements by psychology experts, a defendant did not meet its burden of establishing that the need to question a sexual assault plaintiff about her sexual conduct with persons other than the alleged perpetrator or to conduct a psychiatric evaluation outweigh the plaintiff's right to sexual privacy.CitationBARRENDA L v SUPERIOR COURT (Sexual Privacy) 65 CA4 794 [See: CCP 2017; Vinson v Superior Court 43 C3 833; Mendez v Superior Court 206 CA3 557; Tylo v Superior Court 55 CA4 1379, T/AT 8/97]
|
|
