Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2103 A trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying an attorney's motion to withdraw from a case, based on the claim that continuing to represent the client would be unethical, but without any specificity as to how or why it would be unethicalCitationMANFREDI & LEVINE v SUPERIOR COURT (Ethics Withdrawal) 66 CA4 1128 [See: Aceves v Superior Court 51 CA4 584; Gen Dyn v Superior Court 7 C4 1164, T/AT 8/94; Leversen v Superior Court 34 C3 530; Uhl v Municipal Court 37 CA3 526] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||