|
1806 REVIEW DENIED Since a company vice president usually is authorized to inform underlings about company policy, out-of-court statements by a company vice president about a managing director's statement that older managers would be replaced by younger, more aggressive managers was admissible as a statement of a party.CitationO'MARY v MITSUBISHI (Aggressive Youth) 59 CA4 563 [See: EvC 1222; Peterson v Mineral King 140 C 624; Crawford v County 239 CA2 791; Johnson v Bimini 56 CA2 892; Miller v Anson-Smith 185 CA2 161]
|
|
