Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1938 Under a theft policy that excluded loss from unattended vehicles except those belonging to "carriers," there was no coverage for a theft from the unattended vehicle of an insured's employee who was carrying merchandise for the insured.CitationNISSEL v UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS (Carrier Exception) 62 CA4 1103 [See: AIU v Superior Court 51 C3 807; Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92; Cooper v Transcontinental 31 CA4 1094, T/AT 2/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||