Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2120 REVIEW DENIED A trial court abused its discretion by substituting its own judgment for that of the Civil Service Commission, which had determined that discharge was an appropriate penalty for a city employee's dishonest application for food stamp benefits.CitationPEGUES v CIV SVCE COMM (Food Stamps) 67 CA4 95 [See: CCP 1094.5; City v County 101 CA3 1012; Szmaciarz v State 79 CA3 904; Harris v Alcoholic Bev 62 C2 589] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||