|
1872 Although an insurer was required to defend its insured against an action involving allegations of non-sexual conduct as well as sexual molestation of a minor, it was not required to pay a judgment based on non-sexual conduct, because the non-sexual conduct was so intertwined with the sexual molestation as to be inseparable from it.CitationBARBARA B v HORACE MANN (Non-sexual Conduct) 61 CA4 158 [See: InsC 533; Gray v Zurich 65 C2 263; JC Penney v MK 52 C3 1009; Horace Mann v Barbara B 4 C4 1076, T/AT 5/93]
|
|
