|
1973 REHEARING GRANTED / SEE CASE # 2037 An action based on the claim that defendant, who was under contract to advocate plaintiff's cause, breached common law and contractual duties by agreeing to advocate the cause of plaintiff's competitor was not a SLAPP and not subject to a special motion to strike.CitationLOS CARNEROS v PENFIELD & SMITH (Expert SLAPP) 63 CA4 642 [See: CCP 425.16; Bradbury v Superior Court 49 CA4 1108, T/AT 11/96; Wilcox v Superior Court 27 CA4 809, T/AT 9/94; Beilenson v Superior Court 44 CA4 944, T/AT 5/96; Linsco v Investors Arb Svces 50 CA4 1633, T/AT 1/97; Ludwig v Superior Court 37 CA4 8, T/AT 9/95]
|
|
