1937 DEPUBLISHED Under a CGL policy excluding coverage for liability resulting from "discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutants," the carrier had no obligation to defend an insured against a suit alleging that the insured had caused a sewer to burst by improperly disposing of cooking grease in it.CitationPANDA v WAUSAU (Cooking Grease) 62 CA4 992 [See: Montrose v Admiral 10 C4 645, T/AT 8/95; Transamerica v Superior Court 29 CA4 1705, T/AT 12/94; Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92]
|
|