Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2138 A jury's findings that defendant's product was not defective in design, but was negligently designed were inconsistent with each other and required a new trial.CitationLAMBERT v GM (Inconsistent Findings) 67 CA4 1179 [See: Greenman v Yuba Power Products 59 C2 57; Hasson v Ford 19 C3 530; Tipton v Michelin 101 F3 1145] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||