|
2079 If a party is dissatisfied with in limine rulings, it may request a hearing to present foundational evidence to establish the admissibility of the excluded evidence, or it may proceed to trial, presenting the appropriate foundational evidence there, and asking the court to reconsider its exclusionary rulings; if, instead, it stipulates to a judgment and then appeals, the appellate court may presume that the strongest possible foundational evidence was submitted in response to the in limine motions and may decide the case solely on the record.CitationTUDOR v SCIF (Foundational Evidence) 65 CA4 1422 [See: EvC 402; Castaneda v Bornstein 36 CA4 1818, T/AT 9/95; North Coast v Nielsen 17 CA4 22, T/AT 9/93; Ballard v Uribe 41 C3 564]
|
|
