Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1921 The CHP's pursuit policy complies with statutory requirements, even though it was signed into effect by the deputy commissioner while the commissioner was away; the pursuit policy immunity statute does not violate constitutional rights to due process.CitationKETCHUM v STATE (CHP Pursuit Policy) 62 CA4 957 [See: VehC 17004.7; Kishida v State 229 CA3 329; Martinez v California 444 US. 277; Brumer v City of LA 24 CA4 983, T/AT 6/94; Colvin v City of Gardena 11 CA4 1270, T/AT 3/93] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||