|
2141 A city cannot be required to condemn a leasehold interest in realty that it is acquiring by eminent domain, so owners of the realty are not entitled to receive the value of a leasehold interest held by the city and not condemned, even though the lease gives the landlord the right to receive any portion of a condemnation award allocated to the value of the leasehold interest.CitationCITY OF SO SF v MAYER (City's Leasehold) 67 CA4 1350 [See: Dix v Stone 244 CA2 69; State v Whitlow 243 CA2 490; Contra Costa Water v Vaquero 58 CA4 883; City of Glendale v Superior Court 18 CA4 1768]
|
|
