Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1812 REVIEW DENIED An all risk policy that covered loss resulting from arson but excluded loss resulting from a brush fire, did not cover loss resulting from a brush fire started by arsonists.CitationPIEPER v COMMERCIAL (Arson Brush Fire) 59 CA4 1008 [See: Sabella v Wisler 59 C2 21; AIU v Superior Court 51 C3 807] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||