Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1808 REVIEW DENIED Coldwell-Banker's advertising, and its permitting franchisees to use its logo and the word "member" in their advertising raises a question of fact about whether franchisees were apparent agents of Coldwell-Banker, which would make Coldwell-Banker vicariously liable for their torts.CitationKAPLAN v COLDWELL BANKER (Franchise) 59 CA4 741 [See: CivC 2300; Kaplan v Coldwell AT 10/97; Associated Creditors' v Davis 13 C3 374] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||