Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2100 REVIEW DENIED A car manufacturer's decision to include floor mats as standard equipment was not a tying arrangement and did not violate the Cartwright Act's provisions prohibiting restraint of trade.CitationLLOYD DESIGN v MERCEDES-BENZ (Floor Mats) 66 CA4 716 [See: B&PC 16727; Morrison v Viacom 52 CA4 1514, T/AT 4/97] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||